The BCG Matrix and GE-McKinsey Matrix are portfolio strategy tools that help multi-brand or multi-product companies decide where to invest, maintain, or divest. The BCG Matrix plots units on market growth rate vs. relative market share (Stars, Cash Cows, Question Marks, Dogs). The GE-McKinsey Matrix adds nuance with two composite axes: Industry Attractiveness and Business Unit Strength. Together, they provide a complete portfolio view.
When to use this framework
→Allocating resources across a portfolio of brands or products
→Deciding which business units to invest in, maintain, or divest
→Annual strategic planning for multi-brand companies
→Presenting portfolio strategy to the board
→Evaluating acquisition targets or divestiture candidates
List the business units, brands, or product lines you are evaluating. Include current revenue and market share for each.
1. Tide (Laundry Detergent) — $6B revenue, #1 market share (30%+). 2. Pampers (Diapers) — $8B revenue, #1 global share. 3. SK-II (Premium Skincare) — $2B revenue, strong in Asia, niche in West. 4. Gillette (Razors) — $6B revenue, declining share from 70% to ~50%. 5. Native (Natural Deodorant) — $200M revenue, small but growing in fast-growth segment. 6. Oral-B (Power Toothbrushes) — $3B revenue, #2 behind Philips Sonicare.
2. BCG Matrix Classification
Units with high market share in fast-growing markets. These need investment to maintain leadership and will become Cash Cows as the market matures.
SK-II: High growth (premium skincare growing 8-10% annually, especially in China). Strong share in Asia-Pacific prestige beauty. Needs continued investment in digital marketing, influencer strategy, and market expansion into Southeast Asia and India. Expected to become a Cash Cow as the premium skincare market matures. Native: Rapidly growing in the natural/clean personal care segment (category growing 15%+ annually). Still building share but P&G's distribution power is accelerating growth.
Units with high market share in mature markets. These generate cash that funds Stars and Question Marks. Protect but don't over-invest.
Tide: #1 in a mature, low-growth market (laundry detergent grows 1-2% annually). Generates massive cash flow with strong brand loyalty. Investment focus should be on defending share and driving premiumisation (Tide PODS, Tide Ultra). Pampers: Global #1 in a stable market. Birth rates declining in developed markets but growing in emerging markets. Strong cash generator. Protect share, innovate to justify premium pricing.
Units in fast-growing markets but with low share. These require a decision: invest heavily to become Stars, or exit before they become Dogs.
Oral-B: The electric toothbrush market is growing (8% annually) but Oral-B is #2 behind Philips Sonicare. Decision: invest to win the premium segment through innovation and dentist endorsement, or accept #2 position and focus on the mid-market. Recommendation: invest — the margin opportunity in premium oral care justifies the bet.
Units with low share in slow-growing markets. Candidates for divestiture unless they serve a strategic purpose (e.g., blocking a competitor, completing a portfolio).
Gillette: While still generating significant revenue, Gillette is losing share in a disrupted market (Dollar Shave Club, Harry's, direct-to-consumer brands). Market growth is flat to declining as shaving frequency decreases. Not a traditional 'Dog' due to revenue scale, but the trajectory is concerning. Recommendation: harvest selectively — protect core Fusion franchise, reduce investment in low-tier SKUs, and pivot messaging from 'the best a man can get' performance claims to modern masculinity positioning.
3. GE-McKinsey: Industry Attractiveness — Adding Nuance to the BCG View
The BCG Matrix above gives a quick snapshot but oversimplifies — it only uses two variables (growth and share). The GE-McKinsey framework adds nuance by scoring each unit on multiple factors. Score each unit's industry on: market size, growth rate, profitability, competitive intensity, technological stability, regulatory environment. Rate each factor and calculate a weighted score.
Score each unit's competitive position on factors like: market share, brand strength, production capacity, profit margins, technological capability, management quality. Rate each factor and calculate a weighted score.
Tide: Very strong (dominant share, distribution, brand equity) — score 9/10. Pampers: Very strong (global #1, innovation pipeline) — score 9/10. SK-II: Strong (brand prestige, Japan heritage) but limited Western presence — score 7/10. Gillette: Weakening (share erosion, brand perception issues) — score 5/10. Native: Building (P&G distribution advantage, authentic brand) — score 6/10. Oral-B: Moderate (strong brand but trailing Philips in premium) — score 6/10.
5. Strategic Actions
Which units should receive increased investment? What's the expected return?
SK-II: Increase investment 25%. Expand into Southeast Asia and India. Double down on digital-first marketing and influencer partnerships in China. Expected ROI: 15-20% revenue growth over 3 years. Native: Increase investment 40%. Leverage P&G's retail distribution to scale from 30,000 to 80,000 doors. Maintain brand independence and authentic positioning. Expected ROI: 3x revenue in 3 years.
Which units should maintain current investment levels?
Tide: Maintain investment. Protect #1 position through innovation (sustainable packaging, concentrated formulas). No increase in ATL but shift mix toward digital. Pampers: Maintain with selective growth investment in emerging markets (India, Africa). Innovate to justify premium vs. private label. Oral-B: Maintain with a focused investment in the premium 'iO' line to compete with Sonicare at the top end.
Which units should be harvested for cash or divested entirely?
Gillette: Harvest mode. Reduce marketing spend by 20% on legacy SKUs. Redirect savings to Gillette Labs (premium innovation) and King C. Gillette (grooming). Evaluate long-term strategic options including potential brand licensing. Do not increase trade spend to chase volume — protect margin, accept gradual share decline in the mass segment.
Your Worksheet
Fill in for your brand
Sign in to use this worksheet
Create a free account to fill in frameworks with your own brand details, download completed worksheets, and save your progress.
Download a blank PDF to fill in by hand, use it in workshops, or pin it to your wall. If you've filled in the worksheet above, you can download your completed version too.